January 25, 1995 BULLETIN NO.: MGR-95-003 TO: All Reinsured Companies All Risk Management Field Service Offices CFSA Headquarters, State and County Offices FROM: Kenneth D. Ackerman Acting Deputy Administrator SUBJECT: 1995 Cotton (Upland and ELS) Price Election Change BACKGROUND: The Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC) established the 1995 crop year price election for upland and ELS cotton based on the market outlook during October 1994. This timing was needed so that a price could be published in the actuarial documents for crops with a November 30 contract change date. Since that time, unanticipated events in the cotton market have driven expected market prices for the 1995 crop year significantly above the previously established price elections. Several factors, including unexpected crop damage in other countries, are expected to decrease U.S. ending stocks and increase exports for the 1994 and 1995 crop years. As a result, many interested parties have asked FCIC to reconsider and increase the 1995 price elections. ACTION: FCIC is increasing the price election for upland cotton by $0.09 per pound and ELS cotton by $0.10 per pound for the 1995 crop year as follows: Current 1995 New 1995 Election Election UPLAND COTTON ---- Dollars Per Pound --- New Mexico Eastern: 0.53 0.62 Western: 0.61 0.70 Oklahoma Eastern: 0.56 0.65 Western: 0.53 0.62 Texas Southwest: 0.61 0.70 High Plains: 0.53 0.62 Central: 0.56 0.65 Southeast: 0.59 0.68 Other States: 0.61 0.70 ELS COTTON All States: 0.90 $1.00 For cotton policyholders whose sales closing date was January 15, 1995 (28 counties in Texas), and who selected 100 percent of the price election, companies are authorized to increase the price election to 100 percent of the new price election. These producers may elect any price between the current and new price election but must notify the agent in writing by February 28, 1995, of their decision. Any policyholder who previously chose a price election amount less than 100 percent will continue to have that lower price election. Under the Federal Crop Insurance Reform Act of 1994, subsidy and producer administrative fees are based on the relationship of the price election chosen by the insured compared to the maximum. Many producers already may have made their choices based on the previously announced price election filed at the contract change date. Therefore, to protect such persons from unanticipated changes in subsidy and producer administrative fees, the previously announced price elections will be considered to be the maximum price election for calculating subsidy and producer administrative fees. Price elections that exceed the previously announced levels will be regarded as 100 percent of the maximum price election. Thus, there will be no effect on the producer premium factor or producer administrative fees as a result of this increase in the price election. This rule applies to all cotton policies in all counties nationwide. All cotton policyholders whose sales closing dates are February 28 or March 15 will have the option to select any price election up to the new price elections prior to the sales closing date. Sales will not be re-opened in the 28 counties because of this change. Reinsured companies should immediately notify all policyholders of the price election changes. Catastrophic coverage (50/60) will be based on 60 percent of the new price election.