INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM: R&D-95-043 TO: All Risk Management Field Offices CFSA Headquarters, Program Delivery and Field Operations All Risk Management Field Offices FROM: Tim B. Witt Director Research and Development Division SUBJECT: Quality of FCI-74, Claim for Indemnity Numerous errors or omissions have been discovered during the audit and review process of Claims for Indemnity received from the FSA county offices and Regional Service Offices (RSO). Attached is a synopsis of the types of problems that we have found and the recommended solution in each instance. Since the county offices and RSO s are responsible for reviewing claims for sufficiency and accuracy of information, we recommend that this check list be distributed to all personnel involved in this type of review. These errors slow down processing of the claims once they reach the Kansas City Office for key entry. Although the Kansas City Management Office can correct some of the obvious errors (e.g., line acres do not add up to total acres), in many cases they must call county offices to determine the appropriate entries. In addition, omissions in certain fields can cause the insured to be paid incorrectly. For instance, interest is calculated from the insured's signature date or the loss adjuster's signature date to the date of payment, based on whether or not there is an entry in item 24 of the claim form. If there is no entry, interest will be paid from the insured's signature date. If there is a C in item 24, interest will be calculated from the date the loss adjuster signs the form. Please review the attached sample list of recurring problems that have been identified during the claims review process and provide instructions to all personnel involved in completion or review of the forms. We want to stress that the overall quality of the claims that are being received is poor at best, and that every attempt should be made to provide further education and training to loss adjusters and reviewers. Attachment