INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM: R&D-96-069 TO: All Reinsured Companies All Risk Management Field Offices FSA Headquarters, Program Delivery and Field Operations FROM: Tim B. Witt /s/ Roberta Waggoner (for) Acting Deputy Administrator 10/30/96 SUBJECT: Destruction of Harvested Production Having Zero Value ISSUE: Should harvested production with zero value be destroyed prior to finalization of a claim? DISCUSSION: There have been requests to clarify whether the Loss Adjustment Manual (LAM) requires destruction of zero-valued harvested production prior to finalization of a claim. ACTION: The following provides clarification of how claims involving zero-valued harvested production are to be handled: 1 Zero-valued harvested production must be destroyed prior to finalization of the claim. 2 A Certification Form is to be used to record the insured's certification that the production has been destroyed and must be received by the insurance provider with such certification prior to the claim being finalized. 3 Every effort should be made by the insured and insurance provider to find a market for the production before it is declared zero. Communication through the Risk Management Regional Service Offices and appropriate Multiple Peril Crop Insurance (MPCI) committees is essential to ensure that insurance providers are aware of available markets for damaged production. The following items are to be followed when trying to find a market for the zero-value production: (A) Determine if there are buyers outside of local marketing areas (within a reasonable distance). Transportation costs (in excess of costs to local market) incurred as a result of transporting production outside the insured's normal marketing area in order to obtain a higher value will be considered in determining: (1) the value of the damaged production (see the LAM), or (2) for crops using Reduction in Value (RIV), transportation costs will be considered in determining the RIV of the damaged production (see the Special Provisions for the specific crops). (B) Determine if the production can be sold directly to cattle or poultry feeding operations (for some crops, there may be other types of buyers, such as manufacturers who use potatoes for starch products). (C) Determine if the damaged production can be conditioned and sold. Conditioning costs will be considered in determining the value of the damaged production; or as applicable, for some crops, the RIV of the damaged production. See the LAM. (D) If a market still cannot be found after the determinations in 3A-C have been made, insurance providers may delay finalization of claims if there is a reasonable probability that there will be a market for the damaged production within the next 2 to 3 weeks. This may happen if the markets have bought enough higher quality grain to enable them to buy the lower quality grain. (E) The insured may offer a value for the production rather than having to destroy the production IF it has been determined that there are no markets or other outlets that will offer a value for the production. A value cannot be accepted for mycotoxin-infected grain that CANNOT be disposed of in a manner that will not exceed advisory levels. See the LAM. (F) Document all determinations made in 3A-E above, including names and locations of marketing outlets, values quoted for the damaged production, any information pertinent to possible conditioning of the damaged production, any allowable transportation costs of the damaged production, etc. If multiple above-zero-values are determined, use the highest obtainable value (after allowable adjustments for conditioning or transportation costs, if applicable). 4 Prior to the finalization of the claim, zero-value production must be destroyed in accordance with any applicable Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations (depending on the type of production and/or the type of damage, the EPA may or may not have any specific regulations pertaining to destruction). See the LAM for additional information pertaining to mycotoxin-infected grains.