December 19, 1997 INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM: R&D-97-094 TO: All Reinsured Companies All Risk Management Field Offices FROM: Tim B. Witt /s/ Tim B. Witt Deputy Administrator SUBJECT: 1998 Group Risk Plan (GRP) Forage Production BACKGROUND: Guarantees under Group Risk Plan (GRP) forage production use a trend projection of next year's yield based on National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) harvested yields for the county, and uses the insurance year NASS harvested yield for the county as the basis for loss determination. The 1997 crop year brought weather conditions to areas of Wisconsin and Minnesota that resulted in winterkill damage to some forage acres, which identified a weakness in the product. Producers who purchased GRP forage production for the 1997 crop year insured all forage acres as of the acreage reporting date, and paid a premium for each of those acres. However, forage acres totally lost to winterkill are typically plowed under and cannot be reflected in the NASS harvested acreage for the crop year. As a result, GRP forage production offers little assistance when winterkill occurs if one assumes that acreage that is harvested has no reduced yield due to the winterkill. Risk Management Agency (RMA) solicited comments from reinsured companies and Regional Service Offices regarding what actions might be most appropriate to take, through Informational Memorandum: R&D-97-075 on October 10, 1997. RMA received approximately 15 responses, which identified a clear consensus of the actions RMA should take. ACTION: RMA will allow downward revisions to the 1998 GRP forage production acreage report through May 15, 1998, to account for plowing under of acreage lost to winterkill (since the contract change date for 1998 GRP forage production has passed). In addition, RMA will proceed with updating the GRP forage special provisions for 1999 and succeeding years to reflect a permanent change in the acreage reporting date.